i finally understand what got me so riled up.
it seemed to me that the person who replied (a touch cuntily to my comment by broaching on internet filtering / policing, and that my blog has too many pictures of gorgeous nude men, thereby inducing minors to become horny, resulting in them seducing "innocent" adult gay men), was in essence saying that the adults get a free pass, all because the minor was the seducer.
again, wtf???
is he saying that it was all the minor's fault for provoking the adult to lustful actions?
therefore, the blame is on the minor, and not on the adult?
holy crap.
this is the kind of thinking that gets me.
as adults, we are responsible for our own actions.
we should know what to do.
shouldn't we?
never mind that the minor was the one who made the first move.
the adult shouldn't encourage it.
nor should the adult make the first move, or any succeeding moves.
at all.
what if it were to happen to their children? to their relations' children? to friends' children?
would they sing a different tune?
we know what's wrong and what's right, and given that we lean towards the good, we should firmly discourage sexual invitations from minors.
are we that weak, that cowardly, that irresponsible to blame others for our actions or reactions???
if one ends up blaming the minors as the instigators, and they the adults as the victims, who has the more responsibility to know what is right and wrong?
who becomes the adult?
my god.
and i think it was just less than five who protested it.
the rest seemed agreeable.
i was disappointed, horribly so.
i think it's time to start thinking of leaving that group and its strange sense of morals.
first, it was the group owner who cried "stop your faggotty ways!", and now this seemingly indifference towards adults having sex with minors.
viva la loca.
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment